SOURCE RECORD / S0222
Neuronavigation maximizes accuracy and precision in TMS positioning: Evidence from 11,230 distance, angle, and electric field modeling measurements
Neuronavigation maximizes accuracy and precision in TMS positioning: Evidence from 11,230 distance, angle, and electric field modeling measurements
- Authors or organization
- Caulfield KA, Fleischmann HH, Cox CE, Wolf JP, George MS, McTeague LM
- Published date
- 2022-08-27
- Source type
- peer_reviewed_comparison
- Technology route
- neuronavigated TMS
- Function or setting
- TMS coil positioning and neuronavigation
- Rights status
- mirror_allowed / CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Legacy aliases
—
Related topics
- BCI 最优方案
- TMS 与深部无创
Evidence summary
Evidence: In 42 participants, neuronavigation significantly reduced coil distance and angle deviations versus elastic-cap targeting and brought target-cortex electric fields closer to the intended dose. Key figures: 10.66 mm versus 0.30 mm distance deviation; 7.79° versus 0.34° roll/pitch deviation; 5.99° versus 0.22° yaw deviation; 110.7% versus 119.9% motor-threshold-equivalent E-field. Limitations: not a clinical efficacy head-to-head trial; Beam F3/prefrontal target; title and methods differ in total-measurement accounting; E-fields are modeled rather than directly measured in vivo.
Key figures
distance off-target 10.66 mm cap versus 0.30 mm neuronavigation; roll/pitch 7.79° versus 0.34°; yaw 5.99° versus 0.22°; E-field equivalent 110.7% versus 119.9% motor threshold; p<0.0001/p<0.001
Limitations
Not a clinical efficacy head-to-head; Beam F3/prefrontal target; mixed healthy and chronic-stroke cohorts; title/abstract total-measurement count differs from methods arithmetic; E-field models are not direct in-vivo measurements
This source currently has a local metadata record only. No public mirror is provided because redistribution permission has not been confirmed; use the original source above for verification.